Women's Legal Resource

We Shall Conquer Untruth By Truth And In Resisting Untruth We Shall Put Up With All Suffering
 

  • Common Myths
  • Domestic Violence - Definition
  • Who Are The Victims?
  • Who Are The Abusers?
  • Violence Wheel
  • Cycle of Violence
  • Struggles of Trauma
  • Why Women Won't Leave
  • Abuse Hotlines

  •  NEWS RELEASE

    UPDATED October 22, 2008

    WOMEN'S CONFERENCE 2008

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger Welcomes You to The Women’s Conference 2008

    Please join us on Wednesday, October 22, for an all-day live webcast of The Women’s Conference 2008 here on www.californiawomen.org.

    We are also offering live blogging coverage of all our conversation sessions. It is an honor to share the spirit of the conference with you on this virtual space. We hope that you “Feel it. Live it. Pass it on.” and invite others to experience this day of empowerment as we rally One Million Women on the Web.

    Watch the live Webcast now 7:00 am - 7:00 pm PDT http://www.californiawomen.org/assets/conferenceday/livevideo.html

     

     

    UPDATED October 6, 2008

    O.J Simpson FINALLY Found Guilty, May Be Sentenced to Life in Prison

    Karma’s a bitch. And the old adage, “what goes around comes around,” might finally have come around for our good ol’ friend, our very own celebrity sports star turned felon O.J. Simpson. Simpson faces the possibility of spending the rest of his life behind bars in prison, after he was found guilty on 12 charges: from conspiracy to commit a crime, to robbery, to assault and kidnapping with a deadly weapon. Someone better start praying that he doesn’t get ass-raped repeatedly in the pen’. And here’s the awesome irony. According to CNN, “The jury reached the verdict 13 years to the day after O.J. Simpson was acquitted of two murders” (that’s ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her boyfriend Ron Goldman for all you youngins).”Goldman’s father, Fred Goldman, was thrilled with the result.” Ya think?

    “We’re absolutely thrilled to see that the potential is that he could spend the rest of his life in jail, where the scumbag belongs,” Goldman said Saturday. “Right now, there is not much more to say other than we’re going to wait to find out what else happens.”

    All i have to say is it’s about damn time. Yes, the glove didn’t fit, but he might not get acquitted this time.

    What a way to enter retirement!

    -Womenslegal

     

     

    UPDATED October 1, 2008

     

     

    October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month…Tell a Gal P.A.L.
     

    October isn’t only Breast Cancer Awareness month. Domestic violence impacts 74% of all Americans - personally or through someone they know. “Ugly Betty” star Ana Ortiz (”Hilda”) is partnering with The Allstate Foundation to encourage people to speak up and “Tell a Gal P.A.L.” - “Pass It On, Act & Learn.”This word-of-mouth campaign encourages everyone to talk openly with “gal pals” about domestic violence. To kick off October’s National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, Ana Ortiz is encouraging Americans to donate purses and professional bags now through October 3 at participating Allstate offices. Through an Allstate Foundation partnership with Dress for Success, the donated items will help provide professional attire to domestic violence survivors or women in need as they enter or re-enter the workforce and get back on their feet financially.

    You will also have a chance to win an Onna Ehrlich purse from Ana’s own closet at ClickToEmpower.org while spreading the word about “Telling a Gal P.A.L.” Interested in donating? Visit ClickToEmpower.org to find a local donation location and other information regarding the program.

    Add This! • Email this

    UPDATED October 1, 2008

    Ana Ortiz of ABC’s “Ugly Betty” opened up to ET about her frightening experiences with domestic violence. Ana recounts the petrifying moments of an abusive relationship she had in her twenties, talking about an incident in which her boyfriend started choking her in public.”It was just the most awful feeling, and terrifying and humiliating,” Ana says.

    She is speaking out about the relationship to raise consciousness about National Domestic Awareness Month. “I would recommend for any woman going through that to really get out of that situation.”

    Ana has partnered with The Allstate Foundation to encourage Americans to “Tell a Gal P.A.L.” about domestic violence.

    She is also asking women to donate purses that will be given to Dress for Success — a charity that donates the handbags to women who are trying to get back on their feet.

    Source: ETonline.com

    For more information of the Allstate Foundation:  http://www.econempowerment.org/

     

    UPDATED September 11, 2008

    Sources Say, “Governor Palin Billed Rape Victims For Their Rape Kits”

    When Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, the city billed sexual assault victims and their insurance companies for the cost of rape kits and forensic examinations.In Wasilla, Pregnancy Was No Secret Palin had been in office for four years when the practice of charging rape victims got the attention of state lawmakers in 2000, who passed a bill to stop the practice.

    Former Democratic Rep. Eric Croft, who sponsored that bill, said he was disappointed that simply asking the Wasilla police department to stop didn’t work. Croft said he doubts she was unaware of the practice.

    Maria Comella, a McCain-Palin campaign spokeswoman, said Palin “does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test.” To suggest otherwise, she said, is a “misrepresentation of her commitment to supporting victims and bringing violent criminals to justice.”

    (ANCHORAGE, Alaska) - As governor, Palin has worked in a variety of ways to tackle the problem of sexual assault and rape, including making domestic violence a priority of her administration, Comella said. Alaska routinely has the nation’s highest rate of sexual assault.

    Lawmakers became involved in 2000 when reports began coming in that police departments were charging sexual assault victims for the kits and the forensic exams, which cost from $300 to $1,200 at the time. The kit, a package of sample containers, swabs and other medical supplies, is used to collect evidence from women after they are attacked.

    Then-Gov. Tony Knowles said Thursday that Wasilla was unique in the state in charging rape victims for the cost of doing the law enforcement necessary for solving the crime.

    The bill passed the Legislature over the objections of Wasilla police chief Charlie Fannon, who said it would require the city to come up with more money to cover the costs of buying the rape kits and doing the exams.

    Source:  Time.com

     

     

    Former Baywatch Star - Nicole Eggert Accuses Ex Of Domestic Violence

    Ex-Baywatch babe Nicole Eggert is facing her ex-boyfriend Leor ‘DJ Lethal’ Dimant in court in Los Angeles this week alleging the House Of Pain star subjected her to repeated domestic violence during their romance.

    Eggert, 36, has testified that the pair fought physically and Dimant burned her with cigarettes during a Mexican vacation, after accusing her of flirting with another man. She claims he also threw a drum machine at her, reports TMZ.com.

    A judge, officiating the four-day trial, which began on Monday has ruled Dimant can only be prosecuted for crimes that took place in the USA, dismissing the allegations of assault in Mexico.

    The trial continues. Source: IMB.com

     

    Rock Band “Heart” Angry At Sarah Palin For Using Their Song

    Sister’s Ann and Nancy Wilson founder’s of the classic rock band, Heart is angry at McCain/Palin camp and urged campaign officials to stop using their song, “Barracuda.”

    In a statement sent by the Wilson sisters, “The Republican Campaign never ask permission to use our song. We hope our wishes are will be honored.”

    Last night at the RNC, “Barracuda” was the song of choice when McCain gave his speech. According to EW.com, Nancy Wilson contact them to go on the record to say, “I think it’s completely unfair to be so misrepresented. I feel completely [expletive] over.”  EW.com received an exclusive email from Ann and Nancy, “Sarah Palin’s views and values in NO WAY represent us as American women.”  YOU GO GIRLS!!!!!

    Source: People and EW.com

     

     

     

    Joe Biden and the Violence Against Women Act

    To put fair criticisms of Biden’s record as head of the Judiciary Committee in context,  Biden’s role in creating the Violence Against Women Act:

    It may be hard to remember now, but widespread awareness of domestic violence–and how to deal with it–is a relatively new phenomenon. As late as the early 1990s, many communities had no domestic violence shelters at all, while those that did couldn’t fund them adequately. And neither law enforcement nor the judicial system were prepared to deal with the special nature of domestic violence. If a woman who’d been battered or raped went to the police, she was frequently lucky if she got sympathy–let alone experts trained in how to handle such cases, go after perpetrators, and counsel the victims. “At that time there were no victim rights and [somebody] had to witness an act of violence in order to prosecute it,” says Judy Ellis, now executive director of First Step, a domestic violence program based in the suburbs of Detroit, Michigan. “The criminal justice system lacked information and training on the dynamics of domestic violence and its effects on the family.”

    VAWA changed all of that. It cracked down on interstate stalking, set standards for the collection and use of evidence in abuse cases, and set up a national domestic violence hotline. No less important, VAWA poured money into local communities for the creation of new prevention and treatment initiatives. In Detroit, according to Ellis, a VAWA grant allowed local authorities to hire prosecutors, police officers. and counselors specifically trained to deal with domestic violence. It also paid for outreach programs into non-English speaking communities, where many victims had no idea of their rights–or the resources now available to them.

    So what did Biden have to do with all of that? Everything. Biden had been promoting a domestic violence bill starting in the early 1990s, and although it didn’t go far at first, he kept at it, finally getting his chance in 1994, once Bill Clinton became president and began pushing for a crime bill. Even then, it was a tough sell. Critics, led by Republican Senator Robert Dole, thought the ‘94 crime bill was bloated with unnecessary spending and demanded cuts from it–including the $1.6 billion over six years set aside for VAWA. But Biden held firm and, eventually, got his way. “You can sponsor a bill, but if you just sponsor a bill and let it sit there, that’s nothing,” says Pat Reuss, a longtime activist who was one of the measure’s chief advocates in Washington. “He shepherded it. He made sure it happened. He assigned staff to it, gave them carte blanche to do with they needed, they spent days and nights on it.”

    California - (Harwthorne) Tortured Wife to give up assets in divorce
     

    Cops: Husband Kidnapped, Drugged and Tortured Wife
    KTLA News August 22, 2008, 1:39 PM PDT

    HAWTHORNE — A bitter divorce dispute has turned into a criminal investigation. Police in Hawthorne say a man kidnapped and tortured his wife for five days in an attempt to get her to agree to giving him all of the couple’s assets.

    Mohammad Nassem Hanafi, 56, was arrested on August 12 after his wife escaped and contacted police, according to Hawthorne Police Lt. Mike Ishii.

    “She was kidnapped, held captive and tortured,” Ishii said.

    Investigators are releasing few details in the case, but say the woman was initially abducted from her Hawthorne home and moved to another location in Los Angeles. Police say Hanafi bound her, gagged her and forcefully drugged and tortured her.

    They say the motive was financial. Many of the couple’s assets were in the wife’s name, according to Ishii.

    “We believe Hanafi did this because he wanted her to give him all of her assets and a divorce outside the courts, so he would not have to pay her alimony or split their assets,” Ishii said.

    The wife escaped and run to a neighboring home. The method of torture is not being released to the public. Lt. Ishii says the wife suffered physical injuries but will recover.

    Hanafi is being held in L.A. County jail on $10 million bail. Prosecutors have charged him with kidnapping, kidnapping for ransom, grand theft of personal property, making a criminal threat and corporal injury to a spouse.

    A second man, Kisasi David Liggins, 36, has also been charged in the crime but is at large. Police believe Liggins helped his friend Hanafi in the abduction and torture.

    Liggins is 5 feet 10 inches tall, 170 pounds, and faces kidnapping and torture charges.

    Anyone with information about Liggins is asked to call the Hawthorne Police Department at (310) 349-2700.
     

    The Czech Republic comes up with an anti-domestic violence beer mug

    The fine print says: “Men in Czech Republic consume the most beer in all of the Europe. Unfortunately, the beer changes many of them into aggressors upon arriving home. In order to stop this domestic alcoho-violence, we redesigned the trademark beer mugs of our client Bernard brewery to hopefully prevent its beer drinkers to not lose control over their drinking.”Wow! That’s a pretty strong message.  Do you think the United States would adopted a slogan like that? Comments anyone?

     

     

    Why This Mother Was Not Heard

    The Castillo family's tragedy ["Deaths of 3 Children Test Md. Legal System," front page, April 6] highlights family courts' failures to protect children in the context of custody litigation. The question permeating media coverage is why the courts allowed Mark Castillo unsupervised access to his children, despite their mother's pleas that they needed protection. Mark Castillo's specific threat -- to kill the children and leave Amy Castillo with "nothing" -- was ignored by both the courts and the psychological evaluators, as was his history of suicidal actions. Had the request for protection come from the state, instead of the mother, the court would have listened.

    The reluctance of custody courts and evaluators to suspend paternal access to children despite specific threats to kill those children (and their mother) should be seen as nothing short of astounding. In no other world would we expect authorities to grant unfettered access to children to someone who had threatened to kill them. Yet in family court, the obvious risk becomes obscured. Courts become blinded by the parents' battles. Thus, mothers are believed to fabricate or exaggerate dangers posed by fathers. Fathers (and mothers) are assumed to say things they don't mean in the heat of a "bitter custody dispute."


    These stereotypes are generally false. Mothers rarely fabricate or exaggerate the dangers they see. And parents who make threats rarely do so for the first time in litigation. "Bitter custody disputes" do not arise in a vacuum -- most arise in the context of mothers seeking to end abuse or protect their children. When they go to court, however, mothers' fears are suspect, simply because they are in a custody battle. In the Castillo case, the judge and evaluators apparently felt that Amy Castillo was "biased" and not credible, in part because she continued to have sex with the father and allowed him to see the children. However, mothers have few means of protecting their children from dangerous fathers.

    When they flee, they face parental kidnapping prosecutions or loss of custody, as in a case now pending in the D.C. Court of Appeals. And it is well established that "acting normal" with an abuser can be a survival strategy -- Castillo told the court she was (rightly) afraid to refuse sex. David L. Levy's April 6 Close to Home piece made the bizarre suggestion that Maryland needs more joint custody. "Bitter custody battles" make parents "nuts," he wrote. This ignores the critical fact that Mark Castillo's abusive behavior was the cause, not the effect, of that "battle."

    Levy also, strangely, urged courts "to provide more psychological evaluations." If this case teaches anything, it is that standard psychological evaluations are worse than useless. But lethality risk assessment in domestic violence teaches what Levy and the evaluators apparently do not know: Two major red flags for familial homicide are threats to kill and suicidal tendencies. Had either evaluator possessed this expertise, they might have had more respect for Amy Castillo's fear.

    Contrary to stereotypes, most divorcing mothers do not seek to deprive the children of their father. Most settle out of court. Only about 20 percent of cases become "contested custody litigation." It's not surprising that a large proportion of these "bitter custody disputes" involve violent or abusive fathers.

    It is time courts faced the truth: Custody litigants frequently have a history of abuse. Men who abuse their partners often pose a threat to their children. Most women seeking to restrict fathers' access to their children are doing so out of legitimate fear for their well-being. And too many children are delivered to dangerous fathers by family courts that prioritize fathers' "rights" over children's safety.

    Not a pretty picture. And not one that, if we care about children, can be ignored.


    -- Joan S. Meier

    Washington

    The writer is executive director of the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project at George Washington University Law School.


    Back Home

     

    “Hero” Dad Accused of Spousal Abuse

    August 11, 2008

    Law enforcement sources tell TMZ Hayden Panettiere’s dad, Alan, has been arrested for allegedly battering his wife - Hayden’s mom.Sgt. Wolf of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department tells TMZ Alan Panettiere was arrested this morning on a felony count of domestic violence. He was popped after allegedly striking Lesley Panettiere in the face at around 3:00 AM today.

    He is currently being held on $50,000 bail.



    Hayden Panettiere's father, Alan, was arrested early Monday morning at the family's West Hollywood home for felony domestic violence, sheriffs confirm to PEOPLE.

    "There was a domestic argument between the mother and father," Sgt. Scott Wolf of the West Hollywood sheriffs said. "He got upset and struck the mother in the face one or two times on the left cheek which caused some bruising. From what I'm told, he hit her with a closed fist.

    "The mother called police shortly before 3 a.m., and Mr. Panettiere was taken into custody," Sgt. Wolf added. "He's been cooperative. Earlier, they were at a party and the husband apparently felt disrespected by his wife."

    On Sunday evening, Hayden hosted a benefit for the Whaleman Foundation at Eva Longoria's Beso restaurant in Hollywood, also attended by her parents.

    Wolf said that Alan Panettiere, 49, who has not yet given deputies his version of events, was arrested on the felony charge instead of a misdemeanor because "there were visible signs of injury" on 52-year-old Lesley Vogel's face. TMZ.com first reported the incident.

    It's unclear whether either party was intoxicated or if anyone else was home at the time.

    Alan Panettiere is currently in custody, pending $50,000 bail.
     

    Ventura County Former officer found guilty of assault

    AUGUST 6, 2008

    Former Oxnard police officer Robert Perez Jr. was found guilty by a jury on Tuesday of threatening his former live-in girlfriend with a gun and causing her bodily injury during a domestic disturbance last year that resulted in an armed standoff with Ventura police.Perez, who had been free on bail, was taken into custody after the verdicts were announced in Ventura County Superior Court. He will remain in jail until sentencing, which is scheduled for Sept. 3.

    He faces a maximum of 12 years in state prison, prosecutors said.

    The jury found Perez guilty of five felony counts, including one count of assault with a firearm, three counts of dissuading a witness from reporting a crime, and one count of causing bodily harm to a spouse or co-habitant.

    He was also convicted of a misdemeanor charge of resisting arrest.

    The jury found him not guilty on one misdemeanor count of battery. A charge of false imprisonment by violence was dismissed.

    “It’s never a good situation when a police officer is charged with a crime, but it does show that the law applies equally to everyone,” prosecutor Andrea Tischler said in an interview after the verdicts were announced.

    Perez, 35, had denied that he assaulted his former girlfriend, Oxnard police officer Denise Shadinger, or refused to let her leave the couple’s Ventura house after an argument last year.

    Officers, including SWAT, were called to the residence on July 29, 2007, after a heated argument escalated into a situation where Shadinger accused Perez of pointing a gun at her head, refusing to let her leave the house and grabbing a phone from her and throwing it when she was trying to call 911.

    The prosecution portrayed Perez as someone who always wants to be in control, which manifested itself when he refused to obey commands by officers to come out of the house and surrender.

    In testimony during the trial, Shadinger said that on July 29, she and Perez got into an argument and he became upset.

    They had planned to ride motorcycles with a group of other riders, but Shadinger said she refused to go riding.

    The arguing escalated and Shadinger told Perez she was moving out. She testified that at one point Perez refused to let her leave and he became so upset with her for calling 911 that he stood over her and pointed a gun at her head.

    Recordings of her calls to the 911 dispatcher were played in court, including one in which Shadinger told police that Perez had a gun and was threatening to shoot officers.

    Tischler said she was “generally pleased” with the verdict and praised the members of the jury for their diligence and hard work.

    “It’s important to note that this verdict shows that domestic violence is an issue that cuts across all professions and demographics,” the prosecutor said.

    Perez’s lawyer, Mark Pachowicz, did not respond to phone calls requesting comment.

     

    Xbox Game Developer a Victim of Domestic Violence Slaying
    August 4th, 2008


    The Seattle Post-Intelligencer details the murder of Xbox 360 developer Melissa Batten, 36, shot to death by her estranged husband before he took his own life on July 29th.Seattle TV station KING-5 has a video report. Kotaku offers some background on Melissa:

    A Harvard-educated lawyer, [Batten] was a Software Development Engineer in Test for Microsoft, supporting Rare on its 360 titles work. She had worked for Microsoft since 2002, earning credits in Halo 3 and Gears of War… Earlier, as a lawyer, she had been a public defender for the Mecklenburg County (Charlotte, N.C.) Public Defender’s Office.

    Her husband, Joseph Batten, was also 36. He had also worked for Microsoft but most recently worked for Wizards of the Coast, publisher of hobby games such as Magic: the Gathering. Melissa had obtained a restraining order against her husband on July 21. Another news story describes Joseph Batten as obsessive and verbally abusive, and when she learned he had obtained a handgun, she sought the protection order.

    Eerily, Melissa is seen in the Coin-Op.TV video at left discussing the upcoming Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts at the recent E3 Expo in Los Angeles, just days before she sought a court order against her husband.

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x671n0_banjokazooie-nuts-bolts-at-e3-2008_videogames

     

    Tuesday, July 22, 2008

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Monday announced the appointment of Ellen Gay Conroy to a judgeship in the Ventura County Superior Court.

    The Ventura resident said she was told of her appointment last week and upon learning of the governor's decision felt disbelief at first and then excitement.

    "Is this really happening?" Conroy said in an interview. "It was very, very exciting."

    She said her goal has been to be a judge since she graduated from Ventura College of Law in 1982.

    Conroy, 64, has served as a commissioner with the Ventura County Superior Court since 2006.

    She owned Creative Dissolution Family Law Mediation from 2002 to 2003, and was a family law facilitator with the Ventura County Superior Court from 1997 to 2001.

    Conroy said she will be assigned to preside over family law cases as a Superior Court judge, which is what she wants to do.

    "I love this job," she said.

    Conroy was an associate and then later became a partner with the Ventura law firm Taylor & McCord from 1984 to 1996. She was a sole practitioner from 1982 to 1984.

    She earned a bachelor of arts degree from UC Santa Barbara.

    She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Charles W. Campbell. Conroy is a Democrat.

    Compensation for the position is $178,789 a year.

    Back Home


     

    CNN) -- Scott Peterson was convicted November 12, 2004, for the deaths of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn child. He may be locked up in San Quentin State Prison and facing the death penalty, but he is not cut off from the outside world.

    Sharon Rocha, mother of Laci Peterson, says Scott Peterson shouldn't be blogging from San Quentin.

    Peterson has a personal Web site that includes photos of him and Laci. It also links to his family's Web site and that Web site includes a blog message from Scott discussing what he calls his "wrongful conviction."

    Sharon Rocha, Laci Peterson's mother, appeared on CNN's "Larry King Live" Thursday to talk about his Web site and what she thinks of her former son-in-law.

    Some highlights:

    Larry King: What do you make of all this?

    Sharon Rocha: Well. First of all, I think I could say that being on death row is supposed to eliminate a lot of rights and privileges of the inmates. In the whole scope of things, this is a very minute matter, but it isn't right that they should have access to the Internet, either direct access or through somebody else. Watch Rocca discuss Scott Peterson with Larry King »

    King: How and when did you first find out about Scott having this Web page?

    Rocha: Just a couple of days ago. A friend of mine had told me about it.

    King: Have you seen the page?

    Rocha: I have. And I understand it's the family blog, which, you know, they're entitled to have that. But I still feel that it's not right that Scott has the ability to speak on the Internet through his family or friends or whomever.

    King: So you think a family blog is OK?

    Rocha: Everybody's entitled, you know, to their opinion, and I see nothing wrong with having a family blog.

    King: He has only two blog entries on his personal page. One says he's encouraged by the mail he receives and he enjoys hearing from people. His prison mail address is also posted. What do you think of that?

    Rocha: Well, I think that is public knowledge. There are different Web sites that you can go to get that prison. But as far as being encouraged from other people, I'm sure he is. But the point is I don't think he should be able to access the Internet, either directly or through anybody else.

    King: Do you have any qualms about people writing to him? Does it bother you at all?

    Rocha: No, it doesn't bother me. To be perfectly honest with you, Larry, I really don't spend a lot of time thinking about Scott. I think about Laci all of the time, but I don't give a lot of thought to Scott.

    King: In his first blog posting, Scott writes, "some people have done things to profit off my wife and son having been taken from me and murdered." How do you react to a statement like that?

    Rocha: Well, that's true. There have been a lot of people who have profited from that. But I don't feel that he should be one of those because he's responsible for Laci not being here. I know many inmates are claiming that it violates their rights, their right to freedom of speech not to be able to have communication with, through the Internet or what have you. But they are there for a reason and that reason is that they took the right of their victims. They took their freedom of speech away from them and literally slammed the lid on their opportunity to ever speak again.

    King: Have you complained to the prison or anybody in authority about all of this?

    Rocha: No, I haven't. It's not something that I've even thought about. I read an article in "The (Los Angeles) Times" about victims in other states who attempted to have legislation passed only to have it ruled as unconstitutional by a judge. So I don't know if there's really anything that can be done about it.

    King: So you have no recourse, in a sense.

    Rocha: At this time, it seems to be that way, unless there's some new legislation that can actually be passed and not ruled unconstitutional.


    King: Frankly, Sharon, you don't seem outraged.

    Rocha: Well, it is outrageous for this to even be happening. I just feel that, you know, it just does a great injustice to the victims and their families. They can no longer speak for themselves. And being on death row is supposed to eliminate an inmate's privileges. And this just flies in the face of justice, as far as I'm concerned, that OK, so they said they can't use the Internet, they go around it and they use it in another way. It is outrageous. I am outraged.
     


    Lieber seeking audit of family court system
    By Malcolm Maclachlan Capitol Hill Weekly (published Thursday, June 26, 2008)


    Assemblywoman Sally Lieber, D-Mountain View, is circulating a letter asking the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC) for an audit of California's family court system and the way it handles child custody disputes.

    The letter, addressed to JLAC chair Nell Soto, D-Pomona, raises numerous issues. It asks the JLAC to look into court appointees, such as mediators, investigators, therapists, and attorneys assigned to work on custody cases. It also cites "increasing evidence" that children are being placed with parents who are committing sexual abuse or domestic violence.

    "This is something there have been concerns about over a number of years," Lieber said. "With the audit request, we're really trying to make sure we have a handle on what's going on in these cases."

    The letter also cites eight counties where "large numbers of problematic cases appear to arise." At the top of this lists, are Sacramento and Marin, which is also the home of a group pushing for the audit. The Greenbrae-based Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) has been circulating a 42-minute film called "Family Court Crisis: Our Children at Risk," to try to drum up interest in reforming family courts. They've also been testifying about the problems they see, most recently at a hearing last week in San Francisco of the California Commission on the Status of Women.

    Attorney Beth Jordan, co-chair of the Family Law section of the Marin County Bar Association, characterized the CJE as a group of "disgruntled litigants" who are trying to use to political process to get the results the courts wouldn't give them. She represented the father in the case of litigant Rama Diop. testified at the Women's Commission last week about the "bias, corruption and blatant disregard for the Law" that takes places in Marin.

    Jordan does not contest that Diop was a poor, African-born mother fighting a case against a well-off American father. But she said Diop was represented by multiple attorneys through trials and appeals, was given adequate resources to state her case and made multiple attempts to get the judge thrown off the case. Diop now has joint custody.

    "I'm sure she feels she was taken advantage of because she's a woman and she's poor and she's a person of color," Jordan said. She added, "I don't doubt in any way that the litigants believe what they're saying. I also think they make up a lot of things."

    One of the things women often "make up," according to Jordan, is allegations of sexual abuse. This is often done with "questionable timing" as the mother is about to lose her case.

    Attorneys and others associated with the CJE paint a very different picture. Kathleen Russell, a staff consultant to the CJE, said that you can find examples of the way things should be done very close to Marin and Sacramento counties-just go to next door to San Francisco or Yolo counties, respectively. In both cases, they said, these counties have far better records of following the law, taking all evidence into account and keeping children out of abusive situations.

    "We have terrific laws and procedures put in place for the protection of families and children," said Barbara Kaufman, a family law attorney active with the CJE who represented Diop. "They're not being followed."

    What's missing in many counties, both women say, is oversight and accountability. Russell said that in some counties the family courts have become "a racket." Testimony compiled by the CJE abounds with accounts of parents have to pay out tens of thousands of dollars to an attorney appointed to represent their child, who then meets with the child for a just a few hours over several years. Others tell of expensive "co-parenting" session with a therapist, in which a woman must pay to sit in a room with the man who has beaten her or her children, following the rules in hopes of getting their children back.

    In rich counties like Marin, a well-off parent can use the courts to systematically destroy their ex-spouse, she said. Through repeated orders for expensive mediation, counseling and legal representation for their children, they are "systematically stripped of their resources." Contrary to Jordan's claims, Russell added, many women hold back from raising abuse or violence allegations, lest the other side charge them "parental alienation syndrome" and try to use the charge to seek full custody.

    "By the very act of raising these allegations, they're losing their kids," Russell said. The audit, she said, it merely trying to "create a culture of accountability."

    Judge Verna Adams-who is Presiding Judge in Marin County Superior Court and Supervising Judge of their Family Law Division-said that her court is already audited regularly by the Judicial Council of California. Adams, who presided over Diop's case, said she is confident an audit will find no major problems.

    "In Marin we have a long history of well-funded special interest groups who are trying to exert political pressure on judges to rule in favor of parents who belong to these groups," Adams said. "This group (CJE) has been trying for months to find a legislator to carry legislation to change the family court structure in California. They're trying to influence a small number of cases in Marin. I can assure you that our judges are not going to succumb to this kind of pressure."

    Lieber said that she is close to having several co-signers for the letter. Then the JLAC, which consists of seven Assembly members and seven Senators, would have to vote to approve the audit. The resulting work by the Bureau of State Audits would then take several months-by which time Lieber will have been termed out the Assembly.

    But she said she has submitted bill language the Legislative Council in order to give a head start to any legislator who might like to take up the cause in the next session. This text focuses on changes she said would ensure accountability in the system, particularly when it comes to court appointees and allegations of violence or sexual abuse. If the audit does show major problems, Lieber said, a resulting bill could get widespread support.

    "I think there could be republican votes for it, definitely," Lieber said. "And the governor has shown a real willingness to take on children's issues and domestic violence issue. So I think there is an open door there."
     


    9-year-old tells of sword attack that killed her mother

    Tuesday, July 15, 2008

     

    First, there are wails and a shuffling sound. Then the trembling voice of a 9-year-old Lancaster girl who had just watched her father kill her mother.

    “Hello, my dad just stabbed my mom,” she tells the 911 operator, crying.

    “He what?” the dispatcher asks.

    “He just stabbed my mom,” she sobs into the receiver.

    “With what?”

    “A sword.”

    The screams of her three siblings can be heard in the background. They all had just watched as Jesus Humberto Canales plunged the weapon into his girlfriend early Saturday morning in their two-bedroom apartment.

    At one point, a child’s voice screams, “Daddy!”

    Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies on Monday released a recording of the gut-wrenching 911 call in a public appeal for help in finding Canales, 29.

    After killing Lucy Preciado - the 26-year-old mother of three of his children who spent her days at home watching them - he jumped in his 2002 bronze GMC minivan and took off, authorities said.

    He remained on the loose Monday, and deputies believe he might still be using the van and could be in the Pomona area.

    “We need to get a desperate man off the street. We need to get him off right now,” Sheriff Lee Baca said during an afternoon news conference. “This type of crime in front of children, where children are participants in trying to rescue their mother as she becomes mortally slain, is really beyond the pale when it comes to someone quite frankly in a deranged state.”

    For most of three-minute recording, the girl goes from a chilling calm, describing her father wearing a muscle shirt and black shorts, to the little girl she is.

    “I wanna go to grandma’s house,” she says at one point.

    She also puts the operator on hold to check what direction her father fled in, saying, “He went right on L (Avenue).”

    But she also sounds desperate as her mother slips away.

    “Please, just hurry up,” she cries. “I don’t want my mom to die.”

    Investigators said Canales, a carwash attendant, didn’t appear to have a history of domestic violence. They released few other details about the crime.

    On Monday, flowers in vases, candles and a white wooden cross adorned with necklaces stood in front of the vacant apartment in the 4100 block of West Avenue L.

    “She was the nicest person you could meet. She would always laugh and smile,” said neighbor Angelica Flores, 18. “She cared so much about her kids. She always put her kids first.”

    Investigators said the couple had been fighting off and on for days.

    “He loved his kids and loved her. It’s shocking that he would do such a thing,” said Karisma Figueroa, 9, who said she is best friends with one of Preciado’s children.

    Neighbors said the children’s ages are 9, 7, 2 and 6 months. The oldest is Preciado’s daughter from a prior relationship. The three younger children, all boys, are those of Preciado and Canales.

    In the last seconds of the calls, the 9-year-old makes one final plea.

    “Just please hurry,” she implores. “I am scared.”


    Judge's Ruling On Domestic Violence Draws Concern

    Decision Could Make It Tougher To Get A Restraining Order

    POSTED: 12:44 pm EDT July 13, 2008

    UPDATED: 12:52 pm EDT July 13, 2008

    NEWARK, N.J. -- Women's rights groups and the state Attorney General's Office are preparing to challenge a judge's ruling that determined it's too easy to get a restraining order in New Jersey.

    The decision is not binding on any other state judge and appears headed for an ultimate ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court. That showdown could be many months away, and the outcome could have broad impact.

    Although the numbers have declined over the past five years, about 40,000 domestic violence complaints are filed annually in New Jersey. From those, roughly 30,000 temporary restraining orders are issued, with most of the rest withdrawn by the accuser. Nearly 80 percent of the complaints are filed by women.

      The recent ruling by a Hudson County judge, however, threatens to make it more difficult for victims to prove they have been beaten or threatened and could scuttle the state's Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.

    State Superior Court Judge Francis B. Schultz found that some elements of the 17-year-old law are unconstitutional. Among them: a low threshold of evidence -- just a "preponderance" -- to get a restraining order violates due process protections. Instead, judges need "clear and convincing" evidence to issue a restraining order, Schultz said.

    Schultz also found the law violated the New Jersey Constitution's separation of powers mandate because the Legislature usurped the state Supreme Court's role by dictating court procedures, including what to consider in setting bail.

    "If it's allowed to stand, it certainly would be a significant problem for victims of domestic violence," said Sandy Clark, associate director of the New Jersey Coalition for Battered Women.

    "They are typically the only witnesses to the abuse. So to have to show by clear and convincing standard would certainly be challenging," Clark said.

    She considers New Jersey's law among the best in the country, since it provides restraining orders of indefinite length, along with mandatory training for police and judges. Other states have tougher standards to obtain restraining orders, she said.

    Prosecutors are also alarmed at what would happen if the ruling stands.

    "You're going to have a chilling effect. That's the bottom line," said Deputy Chief Assistant Essex County Prosecutor Debra Cannella, who led the office's domestic violence unit for 11 years.

    "We're very concerned about this because elevating the standard of proof will make it more difficult for victims of domestic violence who desperately need relief," Cannella said. "The next time that victim is assaulted, they may not come back to court because there were rebuffed."

    On the other side of the debate are groups that include fathers who maintain the domestic violence law has been unfairly used against them in divorce proceedings.

    Michael Argen, president of the New Jersey Council for Children's Rights, said that a parent will not get custody of children once a restraining order is issued.

    "If this ruling continues, it would help truly battered people more, because it would limit the resources that are being used on truly frivolous cases," Argen said.

    About 1.3 million women and 835,000 men nationwide are physically assaulted by an intimate partner each year, according to a U.S. Justice Department study published in 2000.

    In New Jersey, about 9,000 people bring criminal charges each year that a restraining order has been violated, sometimes with tragic results.

    For example, prosecutors in Essex County have charged Kenneth Duckett with murdering his estranged wife, Monica Paul, by shooting her to death in front of one of their children at the Montclair YMCA on June 26. The couple had separated in August, and Paul obtained a temporary restraining order in October. It was made final later that month, according to prosecutors.

    Bruce Eden, civil rights director for the state chapter of Dads Against Discrimination, contended that such cases are rare, and that a majority of domestic violence complaints involve no physical contact. Complaints can be filed for making threats.

    He applauded Schultz' decision. "This will make it more difficult for false allegations," Eden said.

    Although the domestic violence law had been upheld on several occasions since its enactment, Schultz, who sits in Jersey City, decided that the constitutional issues raised by a divorced husband, Anibal Crespo, merited examination.

    Anibal and Vivian Crespo divorced in 2001 after about 17 years of marriage, but lived in the same two-family home in North Bergen: She was on the first floor with the children; he was on the second floor with his parents.

    In 2004, Vivian Crespo obtained a final restraining order from a different judge after claiming that her former husband hit her face and pulled her arms when she sought the child support money. Anibal Crespo responded that his ex-wife attacked him while he was in his car and any injury she suffered came when he closed the car window to protect himself. As a result of the restraining order, Anibal Crespo had to move.

    Schultz vacated the final restraining order but kept its conditions in place pending a hearing at which the original judge is to decide whether to restore the restraint. Schultz left it for that judge to determine whether to use the preponderance standard or the "clear and convincing" threshold of evidence.


    New York Times

    Published: July 10, 2008

     

    ALBANY — Gov. David A. Paterson said on Wednesday that he would sign a major expansion of New York State’s domestic violence law to allow family court judges to issue civil protection orders against a far broader swath of alleged abusers.

    The new law would make it possible for people in dating relationships, heterosexual or gay, to seek protection from abusers in family court. As it stands, New York has one of the narrowest domestic violence laws in the country, allowing for civil protection orders only against spouses or former spouses, blood relations or the other parent of an abused person’s child.

    The passage of the legislation comes after years of effort by Assemblywoman Helene E. Weinstein, a Brooklyn Democrat who sponsored similar legislation in 1988 and in every legislative session since, but failed to find enough support in the Republican-led Senate until last month.

    “Everybody but us allows a broader group of people to be able to get a civil order of protection,” she said. “The need became more apparent over time.”

    She credited the governor with helping push the bill over the top.

    Mr. Paterson has been outspoken in support of gay rights and had made domestic violence a priority during his brief tenure as lieutenant governor. In an interview on Wednesday, he said he personally took up the issue last month with Joseph L. Bruno, who was then the Senate majority leader, and secured his agreement.

    “New York lagged behind all the other states in the Northeast in terms of addressing orders of protection,” the governor said. “We expanded the coverage to include what we would consider to be intimate relationships. They do not have to be sexual. Theoretically, it could be two people who are dating and haven’t had sex. They’ve come close, one refuses the other and then the stalking starts.”

    Advocacy groups say that current law has deterred teenagers and gay men and women from seeking protection from abusers, because their only recourse is the criminal courts. Getting an order of protection in criminal court requires reporting abuse to the police, the arrest of the alleged abuser, and the cooperation of a prosecutor.

    Civil protection orders in family court accept a lower burden of proof and do not require police involvement, and an accuser can be represented by a lawyer and not have to rely on a prosecutor.

    “This is the greatest thing to happen for our clients,” said Stephanie Nilva, executive director of Day One, a New York City group that provides legal services and programs for young people in abusive relationships. “It means a world of difference to them,” she added.

    Ms. Nilva said that most teenagers would not even consider reporting abuse to the police and getting a classmate arrested. “That’s not something a kid is going to do,” she said. “They just want the protection and the violence to stop.”

    Sharon Stapel, executive director of the New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, said, “Having the police make an assessment about a same-sex couple at a point of crisis or danger is often a scary thought for our clients.”

    The revised law, Ms. Stapel said, “means that our clients can go to family court like many heterosexual victims have been able to do for years.”

    According to a survey released last year by the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, dating violence rose more than 40 percent since 1999.


    Release Number: 35 Release Date: June 10, 2008

    Domestic Violence Task Force to

    Implement Proposals to Improve Courts

    Chief Justice Expands Charge of Committee

    San Francisco—The Judicial Council’s Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force has been officially charged with implementing the comprehensive guidelines and practices in its final report, it was announced today by Chief Justice Ronald M. George.

    In 2005, the18-member task force was asked to make recommendations to improve the practice, procedure, and administration of cases involving domestic violence allegations in California.

    By a unanimous vote last February, the council accepted the task force’s final report, which proposed 139 new guidelines and practices designed to improve the way state trial courts handle these critical cases.

    In addition to expanding the charge of the task force, Chief Justice George announced that retired Presiding Justice Laurence Donald Kay, of the First Appellate District, will continue to chair the task force and that the terms of members have been extended to June 30, 2010. The original terms were set to expire on June 30, 2008.

    Chief Justice George also appointed two new members: Presiding Judge Colleen Toy White, of the Superior Court of Ventura County, and Judge Steven R. Van Sicklen, of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

    The task force’s revised duties include the following:

    1. Implement the guidelines and practices in the Final Report of the Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force accepted by the Judicial Council on February 22, 2008;
    2. Select and refer guidelines and practices, as appropriate, to Judicial Council internal committees, advisory committees, AOC divisions, or other entities for implementation, including preparation of suggested legislation, rules, forms, or educational materials to be considered through the normal judicial branch process;

    • Collaborate with the Governing Committee for the Center for Judicial Education and Research (CJER) to propose revision of the rules relating to minimum judicial educational requirements to address issues of domestic violence;

    • Study the need for additional resources that local courts may require to implement the proposed guidelines and practices; and

    • Report progress to the Judicial Council by June 2009.

    The new membership roster is attached. More information on the task force and its final report is available online at http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/advisorycommittees.htm#dvpp .

    The Judicial Council is the policymaking body of the California courts, the largest court system in the nation. Under the leadership of the Chief Justice and in accordance with the California Constitution, the council is responsible for ensuring the consistent, independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice. The Administrative Office of the Courts carries out the official actions of the council and promotes leadership and excellence in court administration.

    -#- Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force

    Hon. Laurence Donald Kay (Ret.), Chair

    Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal,

    First Appellate District, Division Four

    Hon. Deborah B. Andrews

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of Los Angeles

    Hon. Jerilyn L. Borack

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of Sacramento

    Hon. Jeffrey S. Bostwick

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of San Diego

    Hon. Sharon A. Chatman

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of Santa Clara

    Hon. Susan P. Finlay (Ret.)

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of San Diego

    Hon. Mary Ann Grilli

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of Santa Clara

    Ms. Tressa S. Kentner

    Executive Officer

    Superior Court of California,

    County of San Bernardino

    Hon. Quentin L. Kopp (Ret.)

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of San Mateo

    Hon. Jean Pfeiffer Leonard

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of Riverside

    Hon. William A. MacLaughlin

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of Los Angeles

    Hon. George A. Miram

    Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    County of San Mateo

    Mr. James B. Perry

    Executive Officer

    Superior Court of California,

    County of Yolo

    Mr. Alan Slater

    Chief Executive Officer

    Superior Court of California,

    County of Orange

    Hon. Dean Stout

    Presiding Judge of the

    Superior Court of California,

    County of Inyo

    Hon. Steven R. Van Sicklen

    Supervising Judge of the

    Superior Court of California,

    County of Los Angeles

    Hon. Colleen Toy White

    Presiding Judge of the

    Superior Court of California,

    County of Ventura

    3 Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force 4

    AOC LEAD TASK FORCE STAFF

    Ms. Bobbie Welling, Lead Staff

    Supervising Attorney

    Center for Families, Children & the Courts

    Administrative Office of the Court

    AOC STAFF TO THE TASK FORCE

    Ms. Tamara Abrams

    Senior Attorney

    Center for Families, Children & the Courts

    Administrative Office of the Courts

    Mr. Arturo Castro

    Attorney

    Office of the General Counsel

    Administrative Office of the Courts

    Ms. Penny Davis

    Senior Court Services Analyst

    Center for Families, Children & the Courts

    Administrative Office of the Courts

    Ms. Carly Lindberg

    Administrative Coordinator

    Center for Families, Children & the Courts

    Administrative Office of the Courts

    Ms. Julia Weber

    Supervising Attorney

    Center for Families, Children & the Courts

    Administrative Office of the Courts


    Calif. Judges Vote For Domestic Violence Reforms
    CBS 5 CrimeWatch
    SAN FRANCISCO (BCN) ― The governing body of California courts recommended major reforms in the handling of domestic violence cases Friday, though their statewide implementation could take time and may be jeopardized by the state's budget crunch.

    At a meeting in San Francisco, the Judicial Council of California, comprised of 21 state judges and justices, unanimously approved the recommendations of its Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force, formed in 2005 with the goal of improving court rules and procedures to ensure safety for victims and accountability for perpetrators.

    "We know domestic violence is a significant public health issue and that its presence has a significant effect on children," said Laurence Kay, a retired justice of the state Court of Appeal in San Francisco, who chaired the task force and presented its results to council members Friday.

    California Chief Justice Ronald George appointed the task force in September 2005, in the wake of a report by former Attorney General Bill Lockyer that concluded the entire criminal justice system was woefully deficient in protecting domestic violence victims.

    "It is our hope that in adhering to this proposal, that lives may be saved," Kay said.

    Among the task force's 139 recommendations are improving education for judges on domestic violence; streamlining the procedures for restraining orders and their entry into a state database so they can be quickly and safely issued, and all law enforcement agencies have access to them; and ensuring that firearms prohibitions are included in those orders, in compliance with both state and federal law.

    According to Kay, the Judicial Council's recommendations will now be forwarded to the agencies overseeing individual judicial jurisdictions throughout the state, which will be tasked with their implementation.

    Some courts have already made progress in various areas, he added.
    Part of Friday's action by the Judicial Council included the appointment of a panel to determine the additional resources that will be needed to engage these "best practices." Results from that panel are not due until June 2009.

    "It's going to cost some money," Kay admitted, acknowledging that funding sources are "scarce at this moment."

    Even with the estimated multi-billion-dollar state budget deficit, Kay argued that state leaders would concur that addressing domestic violence reform is a priority.

    "There's no disagreement...that victims of battery need to be made safer," he said, adding, "Some of it is improving existing practices that could occur at little cost."

    According to a 2003 study by the California Department of Health Services, almost 6 percent of women - about 622,000 women each year - experienced violence or physical abuse by their domestic partners.

    The same study reported that domestic violence took place in more than 436,000 homes where children were present, potentially exposing nearly one million children to the violence.

    The task force also cited 2005 figures that showed law enforcement in California received more than 180,000 domestic violence reports, though many more instances may go unreported. That same year, 125 women and 26 men statewide were killed by current or former spouses or partners.

     


     

    We must confront violence against women
    By Sens. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Richard Lugar (R-Ind.)

    Posted: 06/17/08 05:06 PM [ET]

    One in three women worldwide will experience gender-based violence in her lifetime. In some countries, that’s true for 70 percent of women. No country is immune. From the trafficking of women in Eastern Europe, to “honor” killings in the Middle East, to the use of rape as a weapon of war in Darfur and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, violence against women and girls crosses all borders and affects women in all social groups, religions and socio-economic classes.

    Violence against women and girls violates their basic human rights. It prevents girls from going to school, stops women from holding jobs, and limits access to critical healthcare for women and their children.

    Moreover, violence against women is a global health crisis, not just because so many women and girls are injured and die, but also because the violence interferes with efforts to save the lives of pregnant women and babies. Rape increases vulnerability to the transmission of HIV/AIDS, a disease that in many countries disproportionately afflicts women. In sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, women account for close to three-quarters of those living with HIV/AIDS between the ages 18 and 24.
     

    For humanitarian reasons alone, the United States should do what it can to end this scourge. But equally important, it has a profound impact on the health and development of countries worldwide. Stopping gender-based violence isn’t just the right thing to do; it’s also smart diplomacy. Violence contributes to the poverty, inequality and instability that threaten our security and our broad national interests.

    Specifically, because it impedes women’s full and active participation in their communities and societies, it is one of the biggest obstacles that limit our effort to foster development around the world. Programs to address poverty and disease will be seriously encumbered as long as women face violence in their homes and communities.

    At this year’s World Economic Forum, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice stated that if she could focus on one thing in developing countries it would be the empowerment of women.

    The good news is that local organizations are working in communities around the world with courage and sensitivity to help women overcome violence at home, in school and at work. Governments are bringing together all sectors of their countries to try to prevent and end abuse. But they need our help.

    Significant progress has been made in reducing violence against women here in the United States since Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in 1994. It’s time to throw our weight and leadership behind efforts to help women and their families worldwide lead safer, healthier lives.

    Last fall, we introduced the International Violence Against Women Act (IVAWA). This bipartisan legislation would ensure that our foreign assistance programs include efforts to end gender-based violence. We would accomplish this goal in three ways:

    First, we propose to reorganize and rejuvenate the gender-related efforts of the State Department by creating one central office, the “Office for Women’s Global Initiatives,” directed by a Senate- confirmed ambassador who reports directly to the secretary of state. The coordinator will monitor and oversee all U.S. resources, programs and aid abroad that deal with women’s issues, including gender-based violence. This centralization will help prioritize initiatives and ensure the efficient use of taxpayer funds.

    Second, we mandate a five-year, comprehensive strategy to combat violence against women in 10 to 20 targeted countries. We would allocate $175 million a year to support programs dealing with violence against women in five areas: the criminal and civil justice system, healthcare, access to education and school safety, women’s economic empowerment and public awareness campaigns that change social norms.

    Third, in humanitarian crises and in conflict and post-conflict situations, women and girls are especially vulnerable to violence. Reports of refugee women being raped while collecting firewood, soldiers sexually abusing girls through bribery with token food items, or women subjected to torture as a tool of war are horrific and all too common. The Act requires training for workers and peacekeeping forces, and establishes reporting mechanisms and other emergency measures.

    The legislation brings together, for the first time, coordinated American resources and leadership to this global issue. As the world continues this month to commemorate International Women’s Day, we believe this is the ideal time for the United States to get actively engaged in the fight for women’s lives and girls’ futures. We urge our colleagues to support this measure.

    Biden is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Lugar is the committee’s ranking member.

     


    Custody Cases Put Under Supreme Legal Watch article dated March 13, 2008 to read click below

    Custody Cases Put Under Supreme Legal Watch

     

    Women's Legal Resource now has a book store. Be sure to check out the latest titles on divorce etc. Knowledge is the best weapon in succeeding.



    About The Stop Violence Against Women Campaign


    Violence against women is a human rights scandal. At least one out of every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime. In Europe, domestic violence is the major cause of death and disability for women aged 16 to 44. In the United States, a woman is raped every 6 minutes; a woman is battered every 15 seconds. Rape of women is widespread in armed conflicts such as Colombia and Darfur. Trafficking of women has become a global phenomenon where victims are sexually exploited, forced into labor and subjected to abuse. Murders of women in Guatemala, Russia, India, and other countries often go uninvestigated and unpunished. The experience or threat of violence affects the lives of women everywhere, cutting across boundaries of wealth, race and culture. In the home and in the community, in times of war and peace, women are beaten, raped, mutilated, and killed with impunity.

    In 2004, Amnesty International launched its global Stop Violence Against Women Campaign to help break the silence around this scandal, stop the violence, and create a world where women and girls are afforded their basic human rights. Across the globe, Amnesty International members have united to work towards making women's human rights a reality; the campaign is intended as a contribution to the efforts of the women's rights movements around the world. With this campaign, Amnesty International will show that the right of women to be free from violence is integral to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As long as violence against women continues, the promise to humanity of the Universal Declaration cannot be fulfilled.

    How AI's Campaign Will Contribute to Stopping Violence Against Women

    Throughout the campaign, we are calling on governments and armed groups to end impunity for violence against women during times of conflict and post-conflict. For some countries, we are demanding that governments abolish discriminatory laws and practices that perpetrate violence against women in the family and in the community. In others, we are calling for the adoption of new laws and policies to provide women protection from violence. We support women's human rights defenders, and we are urging governments to ratify the Treaty for the Rights of Women (CEDAW) and its protocol without reservations. In the US, we have worked in support of anti-violence legislation and other national initiatives to stop violence against women. We have worked to increase public awareness of violence against women as a global human rights issue and to contribute to efforts to challenge attitudes and behaviors that perpetuate violence against women.

    AI has used a human rights framework to guide its campaigning work to stop violence against women. By using a human rights framework to oppose violence against women, we help to change the perception of violence against women from a private matter to a public concern that requires action from recognized authorities. Use of the framework also enables Amnesty International to use international human rights standards and laws to cut across national boundaries, cultures and religions to protest violence against women in all its forms. And perhaps most importantly, it makes it possible to use international remedies to hold governments accountable if they fail to meet their obligations to protect women from violence, regardless of who commits it or where it's committed.
     



    Vermont Passes Law to Protect Women in Prison from Custodial Sexual Misconduct

    Amnesty International USA (AIUSA) applauded lawmakers in Vermont for passing legislation that protects women in prison from custodial sexual misconduct (CSM) -- the sexual abuse of inmates at the hands of corrections staff. Vermont was the last of the 50 states to pass a law directly addressing such abuse, though many of those states' laws are severely inadequate. Read more. »
     

    Victims Rights
  • Why Does He Do That?
  • Assessing Risk of Children

 

Web Banner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last modified: 10/22/08 [ Home ] News ] Divorce ] Domestic Violence ] Ventura Sup Court ] Family Law ] Psych Evals ] Resources ] Links ] Reunification Therapy ] Child Support ] Book Store ] Child Visitation ] How To ] Mental Illness ] Childs Bill of Rights ] Abuse Hotlines ] Victims Rights ]