Womens Legal Resource

We Shall Conquer Untruth By Truth And In Resisting Untruth We Shall Put Up With All Suffering
  • Women's Legal Resource helps women who are experiencing difficulties in the family law court system and guide you through the process. Women's Legal Resource are not lawyers and can't represent you in a court of law. We are advocates that can guide you through the legal process. Women's Legal Resource is a nonpartisan organization that supports the efforts for Domestic Violence Reform and Family Law Reform. The present laws as they are written are flawed and do not meet the language of our ever growing savvy Hi-Tech protocol of the 21st Century, which places victims in danger.
  • Top Blogs Yellow Pages for USA and Canada Women blogs http://www.wikio.com Top Resources blogs
  • Actress Reese Witherspoon goes to Washington and speaks out about violence against women

    Posted By womenslegal on March 10, 2010

    Washington (CNN) – Reese Witherspoon is getting serious.

    Witherspoon told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday about her quest to stop violence against women around the world. She said she isn’t alone in her fight.

    “I think when you have strong powerful women standing up and speaking out about these issues, not to mention how many women represent us in the Senate and the House of Representatives, you’re going to start to see a major change in these areas,” stated the actress.

    The actress is in town to attend the 2010 International Women of Courage Awards along with First Lady Michelle Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    Witherspoon is a representative of the Avon Foundation and is partnering with the non-profit group Vital Voices to shine a light on the difficult issues women face as a result of abuse.

    Family Courts Implicated in Infants’ Murders

    Posted By womenslegal on February 12, 2010

    Two Young Boys Killed by Two Divorcing Dads in Past 10 Days

    Points to Massive System Failure

    SAN RAFAEL- National and local advocacy groups are expressing outrage over what has become a disturbing national trend of divorcing Dads killing their children and themselves. 

    8-month-old baby Bekm was shot and killed by his father, Nicholas Bacon, in Meridian, Idaho just 48 hours ago, while 9-month-old baby Wyatt was killed by his father Stephen Garcia just ten days ago in San Bernardino County. Details are still emerging about the tragic Idaho murder-suicide of baby Bekm on Monday night. 

    In the Garcia case, three different judges refused multiple requests by the child’s mother for restraining orders to protect her child, despite police reports and documented death threats by the father in text messages and on Facebook.

    “The system failed Wyatt Garcia and Katie Tagle,’’ said California Assemblymember Jim Beall, Jr., the lead sponsor of Assembly Bill 612, which aims to prevent the use of non-scientific theories in California family courts. “Wyatt’s tragic death was completely avoidable.

”

    Numerous sources report a significant spike in murder suicides across the country by violent fathers who kill their children and themselves, frequently after mothers’ requests for protection of their children are denied by family court judges. In addition, the Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence estimates that more than 58,000 children per year in America are ordered by family courts into unsupervised contact with physically or sexually abusive parents following divorce.

     “The time has come for us as a society to speak out and put a stop to this growing national body count. Across the country, women and children are being killed because of judges’ personal biases and junk science that tells them to disbelieve women’s legitimate claims and evidence of abuse,” said Rita Smith, the Executive Director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

    According to court transcripts and eyewitness accounts, judges reacted with disbelief when mother Katie Tagle presented them with evidence of death threats against her son by the father.

    Judge David Mazurek stated, “I get concerned when there’s a pending child custody and visitation issue and in between that, one party or the other claims that there’s some violence in between. It raises the court’s eyebrows because based on my experience, it’s a way for one party to try to gain an advantage over the other,” he said.

    “This attitude permeates the courts, that women are lying about the danger they are in,” said Kathleen Russell from the Center for Judicial Excellence. “This attitude causes judges to ignore tangible evidence of death threats and abuse. The abusers’ lobby has convinced judges that shared custody is always the answer, and sadly, this case points out how deadly that approach can be,” she said.

    According to a family member who was in the courtroom when Ms. Tagle last sought protection for her son, the judge reportedly said, “One of you is lying, and I think it’s you,” while pointing at Katie. Transcripts from this hearing are not yet available.

    The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence and the Center for Judicial Excellence are part of a growing national advocacy movement to educate the public as well as litigants, lawmakers, judges, and social service providers about the need for comprehensive family court reform. The Center for Judicial Excellence and their allies worked with California State Senator Mark Leno and others to pass an audit request through the state legislature last July. The California State Auditor is currently investigating the use of court appointees in family courts because of growing evidence that children are being harmed there. The California Legislature is slated to consider additional family court reform bills being presented by the Center and the California Protective Parents Association in the coming months.

    “We must assess what’s happening in our family courts, and that’s why I’ve requested a state audit to take a hard look at the performance and effectiveness of the family court system,’’ said Assemblymember Beall.

    The State Auditor’s report about the California Family Courts has an expected release date of June 2010.

    Two And A Half Men’s Co-star Charlie Sheen held knife to wife

    Posted By womenslegal on December 29, 2009

    Actor Charlie Sheen, 44ASPEN, Colo. — Charlie Sheen’s wife told Aspen police the actor pinned her on a bed, put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her after she said she wanted a divorce.

    An arrest warrant affidavit released Monday quotes Brooke Mueller Sheen as saying the actor told her, “You better be in fear. If you tell anybody, I’ll kill you.”Charlie Sheen and Brooke Mueller ... claim and counter claim about Christmas night incident.

    Mueller said Sheen also told her, “Your mother’s money means nothing. I have ex-police I can hire who know how to get the job done and they won’t leave any trace.”

    The affidavit says Charlie Sheen denied threatening her with a knife.

    Sheen, 44, who is listed in the affidavit as Carlos Irwin Estevez, told police he and his wife have been having marital problems and that she abuses alcohol.

    Sheen was arrested Christmas Day on suspicion of menacing, second-degree assault and criminal mischief. The affidavit also lists a charge of domestic violence, which authorities had not previously mentioned.

    The actor had reportedly flown to Aspen to visit the home Mueller was renting to be with her, but the two apparently began arguing right away.

    Sheen is free on $8,500 bond.

    In a 911 call released Monday, a woman who identifies herself as Sheen’s wife says she feared for her life.

    Listen to the 911 Call

    The woman can be heard weeping and sometimes her words are inaudible. At one point she says, “My husband had me (inaudible) with um, with a knife, and (inaudible) he threatened me.” Later, she says, “I thought I was gonna die for one hour.”

    An ambulance was sent to the house but police say no one was taken to the hospital.

    Police said Sheen surrendered a folding knife with a 4-inch blade.

    Sheen stars in CBS’ “Two and a Half Men.”

    Chief Deputy District Attorney Arnold Mordkin said Monday the menacing charge is the most serious, usually carrying a sentence of two to eight years in prison and a fine of $2,000 to $500,000.

    Mordkin said Sheen’s next court appearance is Feb. 8, and no decision on whether to prosecute him is expected until shortly before that.

    Following the arrest, Sheen’s publicist cautioned against assuming his client is guilty in the Christmas incident: “Do not be mislead by appearance,” Stan Rosenfield said.

    “Appearance and reality can be as different as night and day. It would benefit everyone not to jump to any conclusion.”

    Rosenfield confirmed that Sheen flew back to Los Angeles after being bailed out of jail.

    He was bonded out sometime after 6 p.m. Christmas Eve and had a brief hearing Friday night in Aspen.

    “He returned Christmas night. But I have no comment on whether he flew back alone,” Rosenfield said.

    Rosenfield said he had no knowledge of any legal action taken by Sheen’s wife in Los Angeles in connection with the incident.

    The actor has yet to make a public statement on his arrest.

    Sheen and Mueller married in 2008, and welcomed twin baby boys earlier this year.

    This is not Sheen’s first involvement in an alleged domestic violence incident. In 1997, he was tried for attacking his then-girlfriend Brittany Ashland at his home in Agoura Hills.

    JOIN CJE FOR AN INFORMATIONAL PICKET URGING FAMILY COURT REFORM AT TUESDAY’S HEARING IN LOS ANGELES

    Posted By womenslegal on December 7, 2009

    JOIN CJE FOR AN INFORMATIONAL PICKET URGING FAMILY COURT REFORM AT TUESDAY’S HEARING IN LOS ANGELES

    This Tuesday, December 8th, the Assembly and Senate Select Committees on Improving State Government will host a joint hearing in Los Angeles to address the issues of oversight of state government agencies and departments.

    *Local advocates are planning an informational picket before, during and after the hearing (9-10am, 12-1pm, and 2-4pm).  We will meet at the northwest corner outside of the museum (West Pico Blvd. & Roxbury Dr.) at 9:00am to wave signs and get the word out.

    The joint committee will hear testimony from California Inspector General Laura Chick, Nonpartisan Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor,  State Auditor Elaine Howle, and other experts/reform advocates. Members of the public are invited to attend and comment at the hearing.

    The committee will begin hearing public testimony at approximately 2:45pm. If you wish to present public testimony, you must email the committee staff to inform them of  your interest in testifying at Tuesday’s hearing. Testimony will be limited to three minutes or less per speaker.

    Click here to email the committee and register to present public testimony. PLEASE only email the committee if you wish to present public testimony. In the email, simply state your name and that you wish to speak during the public comment portion of Tuesday’s hearing.

    This hearing is the perfect opportunity for family court advocates in Southern California and beyond to present public testimony to our elected state officials regarding the need for reform in our state’s family courts.

    Here are the details regarding this important hearing:

    What: Joint Legislative Hearing on Improving State Government

    When: Tuesday, December 8, 2009 10:00am-3:00pm

    Where: Museum of Tolerance (Auditorium)
                   9786 West Pico Blvd., Los Angeles

    For those of you who are unable to make the hearing but would like to voice your opinion, you can email your comments to the committee by clicking here.

    Please be sure to add your voice to the hundreds of other litigants, advocates and supporters calling for reform in our family courts by taking advantage of this important opportunity.

    For more details, call Steve at 415-261-4784.    

    Movement Against Domestic Violence meets with NYS Assemblyman Zebrowski regarding DV issues

    Posted By womenslegal on December 4, 2009

    At 11:30 AM yesterday  morning  Maria Phelps of A Movement Against Domestic Violence met with NYS Assembyman Ken Zebrowski to discuss the issues New York has regarding domestic violence issues. Here is a recap of Maria’s meeting:

    I had a meeting with Assemblyman Ken Zebrowski and Chris Bresnan (Legislative Director) regarding domestic violence issues and solutions for NYS. I brought Kristina Cotto with me today, daughter of Isol Cotto of Ulster County NY. Kristina lost her mother last year at the hands of her own father, former state trooper, William Cotto, who shot and killed Kristina’s mother in their own home last December. Kristina contacted me last week and wanted to come with me today to address domestic violence issues in NYS on behalf of her mother and other victims of domestic violence.

     
    To give a brief background, Kristina’s mother was a victim of domestic violence, battered by her husband, a trooper in NYS. For many years, Kristina has been in and out of shelters with her mother and has been a victim of her father’s abuse. Last year, William Cotto was removed from the Ulster County NY home and taken to jail after a domestic dispute in the home. Isol was immediately issued a restraining order at the time of the arrest and was sent home. Four hours later, in the middle of the night, William Cotto bailed himself out of jail with a credit card and took a cab back to the home of Isol Cotto. He was given a low bail by Justice Mark Glick, despite the fact that he was a repeat offender and had a restraining order against him, and was able to use a credit card to pay his way out of jail and back into the home of Isol Cotto. Being a former trooper, William had firearms in his home which he used to shoot and kill Kristina’s mother. He then committed suicide.

    I am giving background information here because this situation inspired me to take a deeper look into these DV issues and come up with a variety of solutions to these very problems. First, we discussed the possibilities of introducing legislation for verbal V.I.N.E. notificationsat the scene of a crime. Had Isol known about this service, she would have been alive today. V.I.N.E. is a victim notification service that alerts victims when an offender is released from jail, and information can be found on the back of all DIR’s, yet very few victims know about this option. My ideas on this issue include making it mandatory for law enforcement to separate the two parties of a domestic dispute and/or suspected domestic violence situation, and verbally notify the victim about this notification service, assuring the victim that they can remain safe after an arrest has been made. I believe this would change many crime scenes and give many domestic violence victims a sense of security, which would enable more victims to come forward and feel confident about speaking out about abuse.Another issue that we discussed was the low bail issue for domestic abusers/restraining order violators, and credit card bailouts. In this specific case, Kristina’s father was released from jail four hours after the arrest, and was able to bail himself out of jail with a credit card in the middle of the night. The Judge assigned to this case issued a low bail for this repeat offender, a bail of only $5,000. In my opinion, a bail should be set high for abuse crimes, and there should be NO credit card bailouts allowed. I brought up NJ law, which requires a full cash bailout for individual crimes and brought up my ideas on restraining orders in NYS. In NYS a victim of DV must fight in Family Court to get a 1 year restraining order. In NJ restraining orders are permanent, they don’t expire until the victim lifts the order. In Family Court in NYS, a restraining oder can be issued for a period of 1-3 years-this is under the Judges discretion. I am proposing that NYS issue restraining orders to victims for 5 years minimum in Family Court.

    Another issue that was discussed: DV training in hospitals in the USA. More info on this topic can be found in my archives.

    I brought in letters from victims being ignored by DV service providers, I brought in my own letters to DV organizations and state programs that offer help to victims, but fail at every level. I stated my issues with the NYS Crime Victims Board, and suggested CVB start a specialized DV unit for DV victim claimants.

    I brought in a letter from the NCADV Director, stating that my donations for victims went into the advocates pockets, rather than victim assistance. I brought in letters from the NNEDV, an organization always asking for grant dollars to help DV victims, but then turns me away when I ask for help.

    There are many organizations that do this, receive and receive from our government, but all offer the same service…pamphlets and prevention, “policy” and referrals. There are too many “corporations” accepting federal grant dollars for the same reasons… the NCADV, the OPDV, the NNEDV are just a few off the top of my head right now. And they are all the same from my view, referral after referral, that is the extent of their services. I submitted my letters, my emails, my evidence for Ken Zebrowski to review, and I hope funds are cut for these programs that offer very little to victims. I hope programs that work and benefit DV victims, like Safe Homes in Newburgh NY, are given a bigger piece of the pie for their work and follow-up with victims, as small agencies like Safe Homes are given the bare minimum to assist victims.
    I hope my ideas and suggestions for new NYS DV legislation are taken into consideration, and I anticipate the creation of new laws that will change the lives of many DV victims in the new year.

    Important cyber safety shopping tips for the holidays

    Posted By womenslegal on December 2, 2009

    Here are five tips for staying safe online this holiday season (and the rest of the year too):

    1. Shop From a Secure PC

    If possible, avoid using the family PC that your teens or children use to chat with their buddies and play games online. Those machines, especially if they’re a Microsoft Windows computer, are often already infested with spyware. An infected system will undermine all of the other precautions you might take to avoid online fraud.

    Before you start shopping online, make sure your system is running with up-to-date anti-virus software, and that you’re using a firewall to block potential intruders. Just as important, be sure that your computer has the latest Microsoft software security updates installed.

    2. Shop Smart, and Only at Sites You Know & Trust

    Avoid search-engine shopping, which can often lead to random merchants you’ve never heard of. For the safest and most hassle-free online shopping experience, it’s best to stick with merchants you know and trust. Most importantly, make sure you have read and understand the merchant’s shipping and return policies before making any purchases.

    If you’re worried that you’ll miss out on the discounts if you shop online, there are a number of well-established online coupon sites — such as couponcabin.com and currentcodes.com – that list different promotional codes that you can enter at participating Web merchants during checkout. Generally these discounts range from $5-off coupons, to 10-20 percent off of a certain purchase amount, to free shipping.

    Be sure to print a copy of each receipt or confirmation e-mail you receive. Keep all of your receipts in a folder and filed away in a safe place.

    Never buy anything advertised via unsolicited e-mail. Such offers are almost always a scam. Criminals even build attractive storefronts for fake businesses that close up shop within days of accepting your online order.

    Research unfamiliar sellers. The Better Business Bureau and RipoffReport may offer insights on otherwise legitimate companies that have generated more than their fair share of consumer complaints.

    3. Shop with Your Credit Card

    Most online merchants accept both credit and debit cards. Under federal law, credit card issuers can only hold customers liable for the first $50 of fraudulent transactions, and most issuers will waive even that amount.

    While debit card issuers have largely adopted that same approach, your bank account could be overdrawn while you dispute fraudulent charges, particularly if you don’t notice the fraud immediately. Experts say credit cards still present less potential for hassle when dealing with your financial institution should unauthorized charges show up later on a monthly statement.

    “It’s still harder to get your money back from fraudulent transactions on a debit card unless the process is transacted in exactly the way the bank wants to be, and a lot of times consumers have no way of knowing whether a given purchase meets those requirements,” said Avivah Litan, a fraud analyst with research firm Gartner Inc.

    Never, I repeat, never, shop at sites that ask you to wire your payment or send money orders.

    4. Consider Alternative Payment Methods

    For the truly fraud-wary online shopper, there are still plenty of alternatives to entering your account number at multiple Web sites. Many financial institutions and card issuers — including Bank of America, Citibank, Discover, and PayPal — offer customers the ability to generate unique, “virtual” or “one-time use” account numbers that are good for a single transaction or a handful of specified transactions only and cannot be reused.

    While virtual account numbers may make shoppers feel safer online, they may be more hassle than they’re worth, Litan said. “These virtual numbers generally are there to protect [the card issuer] more than the consumer, but they do give some online shoppers more peace of mind.”

    Gartner’s recent studies show online shoppers are starting to turn to other alternative payment methods, such as pre-paid gift and credit cards, and services like billmelater.com. The latter allows online shoppers to shop online at some well-known retail outlets without ever having to enter a credit card number (the company requests your name, address, date of birth and the last four digits of your Social Security number to decide whether to grant you instant credit). A number of participating sites are offering perks for purchases made through billmelater.com, such as free shipping and deferred payment for up to six months.

    5. Get a Handle on Spam

    If you worry that giving away your e-mail address at multiple online merchants might wind up cluttering your inbox with more junk mail, consider creating a new address for each new Web site that requires you to enter one as part of the registration process. This allows you take action if a merchant you’re doing business with sells or rents your e-mail address to marketers.

    You don’t really need to create a brand new e-mail address for each site: Some free Webmail providers — most notably Google’s Gmail — will allow you to create as many “aliases” for the same e-mail address as you want.

    Here’s how it works. Let’s say your Gmail address is janedoe@gmail.com, and you’re being asked to enter an e-mail address at widgets.com as part of their online ordering process. Simply enter the name of the retailer as part your real e-mail address by using the “+” sign. In this case, you’d enter janedoe+widgets@gmail.com. That way, future communications from that retailer or any company that happens to share that particular marketing list will come addressed to janedoe+widgets@gmail.com.

    Later on, if a particular online merchant generates a wave of junk e-mail offers, you can create e-mail filters to automatically send all e-mail addressed to the custom address you created to the virtual trash bin.

    Violence Survivor Lobbies to Open VAWA’s Books

    Posted By womenslegal on November 30, 2009

    A survivor of domestic violence is speaking out about what she calls the lack of accountability for how public anti-violence money is allocated. In her own case, she says no public funding was available to help her when she needed it.

    Alexis A. Moore, founder of Survivors in Action in Oakland, Calif., is trying to follow the federal money for preventing domestic violence.

    Moore, a 30-year-old law school student in Sacramento, Calif., began to wonder where the money was going after she found herself personally needing it, but not getting it.

    Roughly four years ago, Moore had been living with an abusive man who threatened her and her relatives, saying he would come after them if she ever tried to leave.

    In planning her escape, she had been counting on a local shelter to house–and hide–her. “I was turned away from the then-El Dorado County Women’s Center, only to learn later they had enough funding to serve me at my most dire time of need,” Moore recently told Women’s eNews.

    Kelly Plag, director of community affairs with the Center for Violence-Free Relationships–formerly the El Dorado County Women’s Center–said the center’s funding is a matter of open record.

    “We have specific grant requirements and we report to our grantors,” Plag said. She added that they “have all the numbers.”

    However, these numbers are not available on their Web site and grantees are not required by law to post their budgets or audit results publicly.

    Funding for Direct Assistance

    Since the enactment of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in 1994, the federal government has channeled over a billion dollars into organizations that are required to provide assistance to victims of domestic violence. The VAWA Web site does post figures on grants awarded to specific organizations and the amount of each grant, but does not detail how the funds are expected to be spent.

    This year’s grants from the Recovery Act funds, including STOP (Services, Training, Officers, Prosecutors), Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program and the Transitional Housing Awards, are listed and broken down by recipient organization. In Recovery Act funding, totaling $134 million, STOP, which funds the training of members of law enforcement, received $60 million; organizations in California and New York received $4,659,839 million for transitional housing; and funding for State Coalitions totaled $6,250,000.

    Federal law requires each organization receiving government funding to complete a semi-annual progress report that includes the numbers of grant-funded staff, people trained and victims served. The numbers of those seeking services who were not served, demographic data on clients and services provided are also required.

    The Muskie School of Public Service, at the University of Southern Maine in Portland, receives all VAWA required reports and disseminates them in the form of data reports and narrative summaries to Congress.

    However, the reports do not link individual organizations with any specific figures. Instead, they provide overall figures per grant program, such as grants for reducing violent crimes on campuses or grants for education and technical assistance.

    These VAWA reports are available online at the VAWA Measuring Effectiveness Initiative, which is run by the Muskie School. However, there is no documentation on a per-organization basis.

    The key difference between the reporting called for by Moore and existing VAWA reporting requirements is organization-specific information. Moore also wants more public access to this kind of information, which is not required by VAWA.

    Reporting requirements are not for the Muskie School to determine. It operates under a mandate by Congress. So it would take a signal from Congress for the school to start breaking down its reports into more specific performance audits and for grantees to publicly post this information on Web sites, where donors and clients alike could easily check it.

    Survivors Share Similar Stories

    Other survivors of abuse–Randi Rosen and Claudia Valenciana, two of the thousands of women involved with Survivors in Action–shared similar experiences with Women’s eNews.

    Both women report reaching out to the Coalition to End Family Violence in Oxnard, Calif. Rosen says her calls were not returned and Valenciana says she was denied assistance.

    The Oxnard group’s executive director, Laura Gonzales, told Women’s that she was surprised by the stories and didn’t understand how they happened. Gonzales said the group undergoes regular audits and reports to the VAWA Measuring Effectiveness Initiative on all government funding.

    Gary Cunningham, Executive Director of Victim Protection in Colorado quotes, “these coalitions do nothing but get the big grants and do nothing for the victims, CCADV I was told is not for victims, they provide memberships and projects for education and training only, so much for that working for the victims, just another screw job for the victims and the government pays them for it, this director couldn’t even tell me what VPI did or why we should be a member of the organization again, but it was all my fault for whining too much, what a great deal, I think we should start a coalition and get al the money we need and do nothing like they do, so far NCADV and CCADV is nothing but a joke and an expensive one at that. VPI may not be able to maintain helping victims, if these coalitions keep getting the funding for training, the training isn’t working, victims are dying.”

    After President Barack Obama appointed Lynn Rosenthal to the newly created post of White House Advisor on Violence Against Women in June, Moore launched a petitioning effort that begins with an open letter to Rosenthal about the need to track public anti-violence funds.

    The petition, on the Survivors in Action Web site, calls for auditing government grants. It also pushes for the creation of a federal committee to oversee government-funded groups and provide victims a public clearing house to document their experiences and file complaints.

    The petition has close to 9000 signatures. Moore says that once she gathers 10,000 she plans to take the petition to Congress and begin a lobbying campaign for changes in the VAWA reporting mandate, as well as the creation of a national clearing house.

    Services Denied By Some

    The Survivors in Action Web site provides a list of organizations that have denied services to victims, including the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

    At the Hotline, which receives 65 percent of its funding through federal grants, Retha Fielding, chief communications officer, said the group complies with rigorous auditing requirements.

    “We just don’t always have enough people to answer the phones,” Fielding said, adding that the group received 255,047 calls in 2008 and was able to answer 212,216. In other words, 42,831 calls went unanswered.

    Moore says her idea for a national clearing house for victims to report their experiences could help organizations, such as the national hotline, quantify the extent to which they can’t keep up with service demand.

    If organizations are unable to serve victims due to a lack of funding, keeping a public record of these cases could lead to more funding to meet the needs of victims, Moore says.

    In cases where victims are unjustifiably denied services, the clearing house would provide donors and grant-makers–including the federal government–the ability to measure the effectiveness of service providers and base their funding decisions on actual experiences.

    At a time when domestic violence funding across the board is being slashed under budget pressures, Moore admits her Web site might be consider ill-timed by service providers who are feeling hard-pressed.

    “It’s not easy speaking out,” said Moore. “But I’m not here to make friends; I’m here to make sure no victim is ever left behind.”

    National Stalking Resource Center – does not help victims!

    Posted By womenslegal on November 25, 2009

    More confusion about organizations receiving government tax dollars that claim to help victims, and fail. Below, Michelle Garcia (Executive Director of the National Stalking Resource Center), insists that Survivors in Action stop referring victims to her, as her organization is NOT for victims, but for law enforcement and professionals. Why is there a hotline number on the website? On the top of this website it actually reads “For Victim Assistance please call 1-800-FYI-CALL”.

    Written by Alexis A. Moore

    There are way too many organizations being funded by government tax dollars who do literally nothing to help victims of crime yet they are granted the “Lions Share” of the funding.

    The reality for victims of domestic violence, rape, stalking and cyberstalking is not what is being portrayed by the media or by the organizations that receive millions in funding every year.

    Survivors In Action received an email from Michelle Garcia the executive director of the National Stalking Resource Center requesting that Survivors In Action not refer victims to the agency because they are not a victim service provider. Confused, I visited the National Stalking Resource Center web site where it indicates that they do serve victims and for victims to call the hotline?

    Are you Confused?

    Me too, but needless to say this is the typical run around victims of domestic violence, cyberstalking and stalking deal with on a daily basis and this is unacceptable.

    Many organizations that are receiving VAWA dollars, (your tax dollars) are wasting the money and not doing what is needed to help and assist victims.

    VAWA (Violence Against Women Act)dollars are being wasted and victims are being left behind.

    It is time for the organizations that do the work and actually support the victims to be allocated the funding so that “No Victim is Left Behind”.

    Survivors In Action and others continue to push for DV Reform so that victims of abuse, rape and stalking receive the services that they need.

    When will VP Biden listen?….

    When will President Obama do more than sign a domestic violence proclamation?…

    Appointing Lynn Rosenthal was a good start, however now is the time for the White House to do more than read our blogs and emails, it is time for action.

    Every dollar wasted on a failing program is a dollar that could be allocated to a program and service that actually works to help victims.

    Domestic violence (DV) victims continue to suffer and die at the hands of their abusers—and even one victim who suffers or one life that’s lost to domestic violence is way too many. Yet the victims of domestic violence and their children are not getting what they need from the organizations that have been established to help them. Quite simply, victims are falling through the cracks. In the United States and in the 21st century, there simply is no excuse for this.

    The appointment of Lynn Rosenthal as White House Advisor on Violence Against Women (VAW) signals recognition on the part of the White House that the critical problem of domestic violence needs a higher profile. Ms. Rosenthal has the opportunity to spearhead real, effective change that will save lives and give victims renewed hope—if she provides strong leadership and uses her position to enforce accountability on the part of agencies that provide services to victims.

    More specifically, what kinds of change should Ms. Rosenthal make? Here are the key steps I think she should take:

    1) Implement uniform protocols and procedures in every state to ensure that every federally and state-funded domestic violence victim organization operates under the same standards—standards that ensure that victims are not turned away and get the help they need.

    2) Appoint a liaison in each state that victims and their advocates can contact to voice concerns and complaints when victims are refused service or do not receive the assistance they need, as well as report positive experiences. The state liaison does not necessarily have to be a public official (such as California Domestic Violence Committee Chair Fiona Ma). It could be a representative of any one of the many non-profit organizations—such as Survivors in Action—or state coalitions willing to serve as a clearinghouse. Today’s technology permits many things to be accomplished quickly and effectively, making it possible for such a clearinghouse to begin operating rapidly and at minimal or even no cost.

    3) Form a national oversight agency or committee, reporting to her, to which state DV agencies and resources would be accountable and would report what is and isn’t working, and to which state liaisons could escalate grievances that cannot be resolved at the state level.

    4) Provide strong, effective leadership for the many non-profits, volunteers, and other individuals who are eager to bring about domestic violence resource reform. To be effective, all these resources need to be marshaled and organized. Lynn Rosenthal, along with an effective oversight committee, can provide that leadership and organization. I am happy to offer my services and those of Survivors In Action to serve as a liaison to the White House, help form an oversight committee, and organize the wealth of resources committed to this cause.

    Utility company privacy breach, victims beware

    Posted By womenslegal on November 23, 2009

    The California Secretary of State released today that the Safe At Home Victim Confidential Address Program is getting a much needed update to aid victims wanting a confidential name change.

    Presently name changes are public records even for victims of crime including victims of domestic violence who are at a high risk for stalking, continued harassment or even death.

    With the upgrade to the Safe At Home Program it is indicated that victims’ in the program will be given special accommodations stemming form this legislation that will mark their name changes confidential so that they prevent publication in public records databases and datafurnishing companies.

    I hope this update is actually implemented. Far too often legislation is passed and caught in what I refer to often as a, “legislative log jam” and quality life saving legislation that benefits victims’ never comes to fruition, and the old saying “fail to plan, plan to fail” applies.

    This is good news that CA Secretary of State is finally considering updates, I have lobbied for these types of changes for almost 5 years when I first realized how flawed the CA Safe At Home Program was and how dangerous it is for victims who rely upon it without disclaimers of its short comings.

    I remain cautious and skeptical knowing that big government has big flaws and for victims of domestic violence its far too often a matter or life or death so it is always better to error on the side of safety.

    A message to those reading including vulnerable victims’ of domestic violence, rape and stalking, beware as the utility companies make it easy for perpetrators to locate your home address.

    A quick telephone call to the utility company this morning by a domestic violence victim in California made me cringe. The victim phoned PG&E her utility provider and was asked by the automated system for the last 4 of her social security number along with her phone number. Once inputed the computer system read her physical address outloud to her and she is one of thousands enrolled in the CA Secretary of State Safe at Home Program. Panicked she emailed Survivors In Action, hoping for the magic bullet that would cure this problem. Our volunteers directed her to go through a identity change including name and social security number change, however there is no full proof way to protect a person’s privacy without more instruction.

    Over the years there has been a steady rise in the number of inquiries received by Survivors In Action from domestic violence victims concerned about privacy protection and fearful of being located by batterers, others contact SIA concerned about cyberstalking .

    The victims are scared, confused, frustrated and in desperate need of assistance and support that has not changed over the years.

    The net continues to be new frontier explored frequently by perpetrators who continue to out pace law enforcement and legislative efforts.

    It it is very difficult for consumers to protect their privacy with the number of consumer private records available on-line today. Datafurnishing companies make it very difficult for consumers to protect their private records.

    It is true technology has improved and enhanced lives that is for sure however, the real question I am constantly pondering is for what price?

    For some victims of stalking incidents last for years and even a decade because of the use of technology. For others changing their name, social security number and moving from one state to another is the only way to find resolve.

    It is up to all of us who work in public safety and in particular with victims of stalking to rise above the “status quo” and to adjust to the maneuvers of the perpetrators who are utilizing tech.This requires time, patience and lots of additional hours that the job doesn’t pay for; however, in order to excel and try to at least stay one step behind the perpetrators this is what has to be done.

    Survivors In Action is accepting sign-ups for no-cost training programs for victim advocates, prosecutors and those who work in public safety regarding the use of technology by perpetrators. Please visit Survivors In Action for more information.

    Courtesy of Alexis A. Moore

    Colorado non-profit sends out sos to the state to take action for Domestic Violence and Stalking Victims

    Posted By womenslegal on November 13, 2009

    Non-profit organization Victim Protection, Inc. (V.P.I.), is addressing the need to protect crime victims in Colorado. Crimes in Colorado are on the rise, with a total of 11,636 victims of domestic violence reported in 2008. These figures include 33 deaths that were related to domestic violence issues, 21% of these being the deaths of children.

    There is an urgent need for thousands of people to receive some kind of physical protection service; however, there are no services of this kind available in Colorado. V.P.I. believes that if this resource becomes available, many deaths and injuries can be avoided.

    V.P.I. states, “victims have no physical protection other than a piece of paper from the court, restraining orders, which provide little help”. Many offenders break the conditions of their restraining order, and nothing can be done until law enforcement arrives. A survey undertaken by V.P.I in 2008 showed that 350 people in the Denver metro area needed some type of physical protection service. This is truly alarming, as there is no funding available for such a task.

    There are various ways in which victims can be protected. These include checking the victim’s home and vehicles for devices, providing safe transportation, and access to surveillance. Without this protection, many offenders will never be caught, as victims fear for their lives and the lives of others if they testify.

    It is up to everyone to help ensure Colorado gets the same availability of programs as other areas in the U.S. such as San Diego, CA, and Chicago, IL. Both of these areas, as well as various others, have stalking units and domestic violence taskforces. There is no reason these cannot also be implemented in Colorado – in fact, there is a necessity to do so. If this does not happen, we will inevitably see more and more people victimized and killed.

    To learn more about this topic and how you can help, please click here to see the full white paper written by Gary L. Cunningham, Director of Victim Protection, Inc.